Saturday, March 11, 2006

Mad Cow Desease and Govertment Ineptness

Here is another mess Ollie.


Is our government doing its job in protecting us or is it more worried

about the politics of some contributors? Here is another example of

"don't see-don't tell". It's time for the impeachment of King George.

He is leading a party of politicians that are only interested in feathering

their own nests. They are not concerned about how much of a mess

they leave behind for the rest of us to clean up.

Editorial from USA Today



Posted 7/31/2005 8:49 PM

Mad cow cases met with shrug instead of safeguards

When bovine spongiform encephalopathy, also known as mad cow

disease, first surfaced in the United States in 2003, cattle ranchers

and government officials shrugged it off as a cow infected in

Canada before being imported here.

When a native-born cow tested positive this June, they explained

it away once again, saying the animal was infected before cattle

feed restrictions were put in place in 1997.

nd when a third possible domestic case surfaced last week, they

hastened to note that the 12-year-old cow hadn't entered the

food chain.

The story is always the same. Consumers are urged not to worry

about the chance of a major outbreak of the disease, like the

one that occurred in Europe a decade ago. They are assured

they will be protected by the practices of the cattle industry

and the policies of responsible government agencies.

In fact, those practices and policies are considered so

ineffective that 64 nations have total or partial bans on U.S.

beef products. And the two agencies charged with ensuring

a safe beef supply, the Agriculture Department (USDA)

and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), have

become as much a part of the industry's public relations

team as they are public health watchdogs. Agriculture

Secretary Mike Johanns' response to each episode seems

to be to tell everyone he's going to have beef for dinner.

This inadequate oversight, resulting from short-sighted

cattle industry pressure, forces American consumers to

buy the beef that others will not. It's also counterproductive

for the industry itself, which would like diners worldwide

to think of its products as top of the line.

As the Agriculture Department investigates the latest

possible case of the disease - results are expected this

week — it has reaffirmed how lackadaisical and insufficient

its testing practices are. The FDA, meanwhile, oversees

cattle feed policies so riddled with loopholes they would

be laughable if they weren't so nauseating.

Mad cow disease is spread when cows, which are herbivores

by nature, are fed parts of cattle and other ruminant

(cud-chewing) animals. It can be prevented from spreading

to humans by careful monitoring of what cattle eat and by

effective, timely testing.

At the moment, American consumers have neither protection:

Feed loopholes. In 1997, the FDA imposed a so-called ban

on the feeding of ruminant protein to cows. But that policy has

two enormous exemptions. Weaning calves may drink cattle

blood as a milk substitute. And feed may include the waste

from chicken coop floors as a protein supplement. This waste

poses a risk not because of its many unsavory elements,

including feces and feathers, but because FDA officials estimate

that up to 30% of it can be uneaten chicken feed — which

routinely contains beef.

"Keystone Kops" testing. The brain tissue of the cow

that is currently being tested was first collected in April.

The investigation was delayed because the veterinarian

forgot to send the sample to the laboratory. The sample

that tested positive in June had originally been cleared

by USDA last year. Subsequent tests were ordered by a

suspicious internal investigator, showing how inadequate

the department's testing is.

The industry is right to argue that the chances of anyone

contracting the human form of the disease are quite low.

But the issue isn't the overall risk, but whether the

government and industry are taking reasonable steps

to ensure it is as low as it can be.

By that standard, consumers are right to have a beef.

The feed loopholes need to be closed. Quicker, more accurate

testing processes need to be fast-tracked.

Only then will Americans be able to enjoy their summer

barbecues without having to worry that eating a hamburger

might lead to a fatal brain-wasting disease.






No comments: